Message11313

Author parren
Recipients Ringding, abuehl, astratto, cboos, djc, dsp, friedrich, jcoomes, kiilerix, kupfer, mg, mjnelson, morisgi, mpm, sjtai, tonfa
Date 2009-12-29.12:47:41
Content
My point is just that, given a situation where we need to merge two revs where 
one is a descendant of the other, can we not safely assume that simply 
choosing the descendant is the right thing to do? After all, given revs a and 
b with chosen common ancestor x, we are looking for a version y that 
incorporates both the changes of a vs x and of b vs x. But in this case, if a 
is a descendant of b, then a already contains the changes of b vs x, so 
choosing it seems the proper thing to do.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-12-29 12:47:42parrensetmessageid: <1262090862.26.0.997327561599.issue1327@mercurial.selenic.com>
2009-12-29 12:47:42parrensetrecipients: + mpm, tonfa, cboos, kupfer, kiilerix, mg, djc, abuehl, jcoomes, astratto, dsp, Ringding, sjtai, mjnelson, morisgi, friedrich
2009-12-29 12:47:42parrenlinkissue1327 messages
2009-12-29 12:47:41parrencreate