|
|
My point is just that, given a situation where we need to merge two revs where
one is a descendant of the other, can we not safely assume that simply
choosing the descendant is the right thing to do? After all, given revs a and
b with chosen common ancestor x, we are looking for a version y that
incorporates both the changes of a vs x and of b vs x. But in this case, if a
is a descendant of b, then a already contains the changes of b vs x, so
choosing it seems the proper thing to do. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-12-29 12:47:42 | parren | set | messageid: <1262090862.26.0.997327561599.issue1327@mercurial.selenic.com> |
| 2009-12-29 12:47:42 | parren | set | recipients:
+ mpm, tonfa, cboos, kupfer, kiilerix, mg, djc, abuehl, jcoomes, astratto, dsp, Ringding, sjtai, mjnelson, morisgi, friedrich |
| 2009-12-29 12:47:42 | parren | link | issue1327 messages |
| 2009-12-29 12:47:41 | parren | create | |
|