converted to 1.6 markup
|Deletions are marked like this.||Additions are marked like this.|
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
|[http://www.advogato.org/person/connolly/ advogato diary],
[http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ homepage at W3C].
[[http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/|homepage at W3C]].
|Line 23:||Line 23:|
|context of [http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Diff RDF diff]
and [http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/PaperTrail.html paper trail].
|context of [[http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Diff|RDF diff]]
and [[http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/PaperTrail.html|paper trail]].
|Line 28:||Line 28:|
|[http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2005-June/000710.html 23 Apr 2003 msg from Tom Lord]:||[[http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2005-June/000710.html|23 Apr 2003 msg from Tom Lord]]:|
/yes, I should send all this stuff to the MailingList... but I still feel I should do some more study before I oblige the mailing list subscribers to consider these issues./
Trying to test hg on an svn project; I tried these tailor.py commands:
source_repository svn+ssh://dirk/home/connolly/webtechs-svn/ source_module bottles source_kind svn target_kind hg logfile scm-convert-log state_file scm-map print_executed_commands 1 bootstrap 1 update
but tailor.py doesn't seem to use hg addremove, so it's not working: files don't seem to get added, and a lot of SVN revisions turn into noops.
The cryptographic history style of git and hg is cool in a lot of ways, but I wonder about this 23 Apr 2003 msg from Tom Lord:
/However, in a distributed system -- whether that system is a distributed SCM or just a bunch of programmers trading trees and patches by hand -- it is simply not realistic to assume that the unbounded amount of history needed for your merge technique will be reliably available./
/You have, in effect, a tree of revisions. The loss of any one node partitions that tree into two trees of revisions and makes your style of merging between those two revision trees, thereafter, impossible./
/Loss of a network site? Disk crash and a bad back-up tape? Node has to be taken (or kept) off-line because some NDA-data slipped into it? End of the world./
It seems that CVS is more fractal in this way: I sometimes start with a local RCS repository and copy the ,v files into a CVS repostitory. I suppose hg handles that case, and better. But what about splitting a module out of a CVS repostory into its own repository, and preserving the history?
And what about checking out just part of a huge project? The entire W3C web site, going back to 1995, is one huge CVS repostory. I know the hg repository format is compact, but even so, I don't want to check out gigabytes worth of history just to edit the minutes of a meeting.
Also... shouldn't hgweb export the actual contents of the tip into HTTP space? Navigating the history is all well and good, but how about the actual state, without the pretty-printing etc. I think SVN does this.
Ah... NewWebInterface seems to be what I want.